Alfie Kohn writes that incentives and rewards used in schools are archaic remnants of behaviorism, a psychological theory that posits that human and animal behavior is conditioned and shaped by reward and punishment. Progressive education, while not a psychological theory, advances the idea that schools should encourage critical thinking and intellectual curiosity in order to develop intrinsic motivation in our children.At Watershed School we wondered if giving students awards at the end of the year was inconsistent with our program’s progressive philosophy of education which describes learning as experiential and developmentally appropriate. We believe that children learn best when they are engaged in real world problem solving and meaningful activities. These tenets are certainly mirrored in progressive education which holds discovery, activity, experience, and the cultivation of individuality as critical components of a suitable learning environment.
Research on the effects of rewards on motivation generally shows that the negative effects of rewards are pervasive, unless there is clear and compelling informational value in the reward. For the most part, when people are rewarded they lose focus on the internal motivation (feelings of pride, accomplishment, and self affirmation) and focus on the external motivation (money, pleasing others, and social affirmation).
Our teachers are reluctant to continue the practice of giving awards to students. Historically the school has named one or two recipients of the ICE (Integrity, Craftsmanship and Expeditionary Behavior) award at its graduation ceremony. Does this impact industriousness? Inspire future acts of leadership among the student body? Or does it leave the rest of the students feeling deflated and inadequate? How does rewarding performance impact creativity?
An interesting study on the effects of rewards (Selart, Nordstrom, Kunaas & Tekemura, 2008) showed that when people are rewarded for a specific task, their motivation is not impacted. However when people are rewarded for performance, they are less likely to experiment with creative ideas, thus their internal motivation is reduced and creative output is stifled.
Certainly a progressive school like Watershed seeks to foster creativity and self-efficacy, and would be failing in its mission if its practices suppressed critical thinking. What do you think? Are we “punished by rewards”?
References
Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by rewards. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Pierce, W., Cameron, J., Banko, K., and So, S. (2003). Positive effects of rewards and performance standards on intrinsic motivation. The Psychological Record, 53, pp. 561-579.
Selart, M., Nordstrom, T., Kuvaas, B., and Tekemura, K. (2008). Effects of rewards on self-regulation, intrinsic motivation and creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 5, pp. 439-458.
